Archives For streaming

You would have to be a masochist to stream a pitcher at Coors Field.

Photo courtesy of Kwong Yee Chang.

Once the season is a couple of weeks old, something you can count on from me every Monday morning a Dixon’s Picks list of 3-5 starting pitcher’s who meet two requirements.

  1. They’re probably on your waiver wire.
  2. They’re probably good streaming pickups for that week.

I know from reader comments and past playing that streaming pitchers is a bit of a controversial issue. It’s not something everyone uses and many who don’t use it don’t have a lot of respect for those who do.

We all use it to somewhat varying degrees. None of us go nuts streaming, as that’s really not something you can do unless it’s the end of a head-to-head matchup and categories like ERA and WHIP are decided.

The risks are obvious. When you’re dealing with pitchers on the waiver wire and the season is more than about a month old, they’re probably there for a reason: they’re not very good.

There ways you can combat that, though, although nothing is flawless. There are two things you want to know.

  1. Who are they facing?
  2. Where are they facing them? 

My goal here was to create something of a cheat sheet for the upcoming season, at least the early part of it. When you’re choosing a pitcher, you want to know how dangerous the lineup he’s facing is.

Nothing is more important than runs allowed. So, courtesy of Baseball-Reference, let’s take a look at how teams scored last year.

Rank Team RPG
1. Texas Rangers 4.99
2. New York Yankees 4.96
3. Milwaukee Brewers 4.79
4. Los Angeles Angels 4.73
5. St. Louis Cardinals 4.72
6. Colorado Rockies 4.68
7. Chicago White Sox 4.62
T8. Arizona Diamondbacks 4.53
T8. Boston Red Sox 4.53
10. Washington Nationals 4.51
11. Detroit Tigers 4.48
12. San Francisco Giants 4.43
13. Toronto Blue Jays 4.42
T14. Baltimore Orioles 4.40
T14. Oakland Athletics 4.40
16. Minnesota Twins 4.33
17. Atlanta Braves 4.32
18. Tampa Bay Rays 4.30
19. Philadelphia Phillies 4.22
20. Kansas City Royals 4.17
21. Cincinnati Reds 4.13
22. Cleveland Indians 4.12
T23. Pittsburgh Pirates 4.02
T23. San Diego Padres 4.02
25. New York Mets 4.01
26. Los Angeles Dodgers 3.93
27. Seattle Mariners 3.82
28. Chicago Cubs 3.78
29. Miami Marlins 3.76
30. Houston Astros 3.60

A few that should change in 2013:

  1. The Marlins are in for a huge regression, which says a lot considering they were second-to-last in runs scored last year. Since last July, they’ve dealt Hanley Ramirez, Gaby Sanchez, Omar Infante, Jose Reyes, John Buck, Emilio Bonifacio, and Yunel Escobar. Logan Morrison may well be on the move before Opening Day. That of course leaves Giancarlo Stanton, who will be hitting a lot of very impressive solo home runs in 2013. When you consider the pitchers they’ll have to face in the NL East, this should not only lowest-scoring team in the league next season, but will probably have that by quite some margin.
  2. The Los Angeles Dodgers shouldn’t be that bad at scoring runs again. They still don’t have a lot of lineup depth at Chavez Ravine, but a lineup with Hanley Ramirez, Adrian Gonzalez, Matt Kemp, Andre Ethier, and Carl Crawford should scrape runs across the plate at a decent rate.
  3. It’s hard to imagine the Blue Jays being a middle-of-the-pack team. Of the players named above, Bonifacio, Buck, and Reyes all now call Toronto home. Throw them into the mix with the newly-signed Melky Cabrera, returning masher Edwin Encarnacion, and a healthy Jose Bautista, this team will score runs.

 

Obviously if a team’s scoring runs, they’re not good to stream against. Conversely, if they’re not scoring runs, it’s a pretty good bet. As a general rule, I’d say to avoid teams in the Top-10 in runs scored, and feel pretty good about teams in the Bottom-10. Sure, there are exceptions to make once the season begins, but that’s a general guideline to follow.

But what about those teams ranked 11-20. That’s where you have to know where they’re playing. Baseball-Reference has a way of grading parks which I really don’t want to get into here. If you’re interested, I would encourage you to read their formula.

The only thing we need to go over here is that when giving a stadium a grade for pitching, if it’s under 100, it’s considered pitcher-friendly. If it’s over 100, it’s not so pitcher-friendly. So, let’s see how the 30 parks graded not only in 2012, but over their whole existence

Stadium/Home Team  2012 Grade Multi-Year Grade
AT&T Park/San Francisco Giants 87 88
Safeco Field/Seattle Mariners 88 91
PNC Park/Pittsburgh Pirates 90 94
Angel Stadium of Anaheim/Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim 91 92
Petco Park/San Diego Padres 93 92
Progressive Field/Cleveland Indians 93 95
Tropicana Field/Tampa Bay Rays 94 93
Dodger Stadium/Los Angeles Dodgers 94 96
The Coliseum/Oakland Athletics 96 97
Citi Field/New York Mets 96 97
Yankee Stadium/New York Yankees 98 102
Minute Maid Park/Houston Astros 99 101
Busch Stadium/St. Louis Cardinals 100 97
Marlins Park/Miami Marlins 100 100
Kauffman Stadium/Kansas City Royals 100 100
Nationals Park/Washington Nationals 100 100
Citizen’s Bank Park/Philadelphia Phillies 100 101
Target Field/Minnesota Twins 101 99
Wrigley Field/Chicago Cubs 102 99
Miller Park/Milwaukee Brewers 103 104
Turner Field/Atlanta Braves 104 101
Comerica Park/Detroit Tigers 104 103
Rogers Centre/Toronto Blue Jays 104 104
Chase Field/Arizona Diamondbacks 104 105
Rangers Ballpark in Arlington/Texas Rangers 106 111
Fenway Park/Boston Red Sox 107 106
Great American Ballpark/Cincinnati Reds 107 107
Oriole Park at Camden Yards/Baltimore Orioles 109 103
US Cellular Field/Chicago White Sox 113 106
Coors Field/Colorado Rockies 125 121

Again, let’s take a look at a few things.

  1. Don’t ever stream a pitcher pitching in Coors Field. The ball not only carries extremely well there, but the deep gaps also cause the outfielders to play so far back that cheap singles fall in frequently and with fast runners, they turn into doubles. There is no stadium in the league like it. I love the park personally, but I think about benching my aces when they’re pitching in Colorado. I would never consider bringing in a waiver wire guy.
  2. The Giants have won two of the last three World Series’, but their yard is very pitcher-friendly. I might show a little bit of restraint streaming against them, but not a lot. Their 2012 offense was basically middle-of-the road and their park is just geared to the pitcher.
  3. Despite having pretty good reputations as hitter’s parks, neither Yankee Stadium or Minute Maid Park grade that bad. I must admit, this came as a shock to me. Part of Minute Maid’s grade is that the Astros have been a train-wreck for several years, but the Yankees are generally about as potent as any lineup in baseball. A 102 over the years is actually not bad and a 98 in 2012 was downright shocking.

 

So, what does this information do for you?

Today, nothing. As the 2013 season gets going, you’ll be able to track how well teams are scoring runs. Knowing the 2012 runs scored will help you more in the early going.

But if you take anything from this, make it how the parks all grade out. I had perceptions about a few of them that don’t quite match the reality of them.

Adam Ottavino

Last week I filled in for Nash on his ‘Ask Nash‘ column and hopefully I didn’t butcher it too bad. This week I’m filling in for Dixon on his Dixon’s Picks column so let’s hope the butchering is, once again, at a minimum. Although any butchering has to be less than the Butchers of the MLB, or whatever folks are calling baseball trainers nowadays. I feel like this season’s collection of pitching injuries has had more players under the knife than a Sweeny Todd show. Am I right?

But I think I can find 3 quality pitchers who are injury free and flying under the radar of more than 50% of owners. Both Dixon and I like to build a pitching staff on the cheap and are accomplished streamers. Yet, we’ve never talked methodology, so I not sure what his eye looks for as he makes his picks. Whatever it is, Dixon is darned successful at it.

I can tell you that my method is suspect. Basically, I look at a few identifiers – strength of schedule, matchups, recent performance, and underlying metrics – then go with my gut and hope I spit out a unicorn. Although going with my gut is probably not the most reassuring method, I can say that this season I’ve built a pitching staff with an ERA below 3 and a WHIP of 1.08, largely by streaming pitchers. That’s the equivalent of spitting out a unicorn, a bag of Dum Dum suckers, and a handful of magic beans, so I’m confident we’ll do pretty well this week. I’ll try not to let you down, at least.

 

Matt Harvey - New York Mets

Probable Starts: vs. Philadelphia Phillies

Only one start for Matt Harvey this week, but I’m including him because I feel like he’s worth more than a catch and release. I’ve written about Harvey before. I suggested taking a look at his first couple of starts to see if he’s ready and we have.

Harvey has given us no less than 43 K’s in 36 IP since he’s been called up. That is worthy of an add if you need pitching help.

Harvey’s Projections for the Week

IP      H      BB      ER      W      K      ERA      WHIP     
6 4 3 2 1 7 3.00 1.17

 

Brett Anderson - Oakland Athletics

Probable Starts: vs. Cleveland Indians, vs. Boston Red Sox

Here’s another pitcher that is worth more than a catch and release, so hook him quickly because his ownership numbers will rise quickly. When healthy Brett Anderson is one of the top 20 pitchers in the game, but he lost a season due to Tommy John surgery. Again, those butchers! Honestly, I think all you need to be a trainer in the MLB is to have a taxidermy license.

In case you’ve forgotten about Anderson I’ll give you a two sentence scouting report. Anderson is a 6’4′ lefty with a monster sinker that generates a ton of ground balls. He’s also lost about 30 pounds so he looks less like Bartolo Colon, which is nice.

Anderson’s Projections for the Week
IP      H      BB      ER      W      K      ERA      WHIP     
13 10 3 4 2 11

 

Hisashi Iwakuma - Seattle Mariners
 
Probable Starts: vs. Minnesota Twins
I apologize that I wasn’t able to find you another two-start pitcher, but I’d rather one one favorable start than two stinkers, and most of the two start guys this week are elite and owned in most leagues or bums that will do you more harm than good.
Hisashi Iwakuma has been darned solid of late. Over the last 30 days he’s had a 2.20 ERA, 1.13 WHIP, and 32 K’s in 32.2 IP. He’s a solid bet to have a good outing versus the Twins.
Hisashi’s Projections for the Week
IP      H      BB      ER      W      K      ERA      WHIP     
7 6 2 2 1 5 2.57 1.14
BONUS: Adam Ottavino - Colorado Rockies
 
Probable Starts: None
I admit that the inclusion of Adam Ottavino is odd. Ottavino is one of the “piggyback” relievers being sent out as a result of Colorado’s 4-man rotation. As a result, he gets 2-3 innings just about every three days.
It’s an odd role but he’s been absolutely dominate in it by coming into the 5th through 7th innings, then giving way to Colorado’s bullpen. In the month of August he’s got a 2.35 / 0.91 line with 3 vulture Wins, a Hold, and 18 strikeouts in 23 innings. If you are simply looking for innings – like if you are in a dogfight for strikeouts or need to drop your ERA – then Ottavino could be an out–of-the-box roster add for you. Pick him up and leave in your lineup, placing him in the spot that any resting starter is not occupying.
Ottavino’s Projections for the Week
IP      H      BB      ER      W      K      ERA      WHIP     
5 4 2 1 1 5 1.80 1.00

Is Jason Vargas legit as a fantasy baseball starter?
Ben

Good question, Ben. At this point in the season we need to start looking at guys that we might be streaming in and ask ourselves if the guy should be kept on the roster.  One such guy is Jason Vargas.

Last Monday he faced a truer test in the Boston Red Sox, that might help us decide to move him from good streaming option into a legit fantasy option.  Although the Boston Red sox are not banging on all cylinders, they are certainly a team that can expose a pitcher that leaves balls hanging or has been getting guys to chase balls out of the zone.  Pitching at Fenway, or on the road at all, is a good test for those pitchers turning the streamable corner to legit.

Vargas is pitching well this season, on pace for better than his past 2 seasons:
2010: 192.2 innings, 116 Ks and 54 BBs
2011: 201.0 innings, 131 Ks and 59 BBs

This year’s pace:
2012: 243.2 innings 181 ks and 62 BBs.

This is a nice pace for only his 3rd full season in the bigs and two things jump out at me:

  1. His strikeout pace is up
  2. His walk pace is down
So of course I wanted to know if this is a trend or perhaps just a good few games early in the season.His K/9 for the past 3 seasons is 5.42, 5.87. 6.62; his BB/9 is 2.52, 2.64, 2.26.  Clearly he was headed in the right direction strikeout wise, and even as he levels off to form around his BB/9 rates, he seems to be a guy that will be a valuable asset to your fantasy team this season.Now let’s look at this season by game since we know that how he plays against certain opponents can go a long way in telling us if he is turning a corner or not.

DATE

OPP

IP

H

ER

BB

K

DEC

5/9

Det

8.0

5

1

0

6

W

5/4

Min

6.1

4

1

2

5

4/29

@Tor

6.0

4

2

3

4

L

4/24

@Det

6.0

6

4

1

4

W

4/18

Cle

7.0

4

1

3

7

W

4/12

@Tex

6.2

7

4

1

6

L

4/6

@Oak

5.1

5

2

1

3

W

3/29

@Oak

6.1

2

1

2

3

Clearly Vargas has held his own against tougher opponents such as the Rangers and the Tigers.  His only other bad outing was against the Blue Jays who are a tough draw, especially when they are home.

So I think it is safe to say that Jason Vargas is on his way to no longer being JUST a nice stream-in guy but a legit fantasy starting option. But before we decide, let’s take a look at his last two starts.

He did not fare so well against the Red Sox last Monday: 6.0 IP 7 hits 5 ERs 3 BB 3 Ks taking a loss

But in his next start after that I felt he showed some true grit.  Pitching at Coors field is certainly not ideal, and Vargas put out a respectable 7 innings with 5 hits, 3 ERs, 1 BB 1 K and took the win.

Vargas will have another test this Thursday against the uneven division rival the Angels.  This test will come in the friendly confines of Safeco field.

So what are we left with?

  • As of right now Vargas is just a guy who should be streamed if available whenever pitching at home,against a weak opponent, or at a good pitchers park.
  • In deeper leagues I would hold onto Vargas and just spot start him accordingly.  His Ks have have seemed to level off to more his norm, BUT if he gets back to higher Ks and keeps the walks down this is a guy that that anyone is a 12 team or deeper league should be on top of!

[Editor's Note: The title of this post was not approved by Nash. He didn't think it was very punny.]  If you have fantasy baseball questions you can Ask Nash, plus you can follow the Crackerjacks on Twitter.

The second edition of Crackerjack Chat is in the books. We had a few unfortunate technical issues, but streaming was talked about from several different angles. What is streaming in fantasy baseball? What do people think about it? Is it a good strategy?

Follow the link at the bottom to listen to what Nash and Dixon had to say on the matter, and feel free to leave any comments.

Listen to internet radio with Cracker Jack Chat on Blog Talk Radio

Or click here.

Crackerjack Chat: Streaming

Michael Dixon —  April 21, 2012 — Leave a comment

Loyal readers. Fantasy Baseball Crackerjacks will be hosting its second ever podcast this Tuesday at 11 p.m. Eastern time, which is 8 p.m. Pacific, 9 p.m. Mountain, and 10 p.m. Central.

We invite all of you guys to join us here, if you can’t make it for the live podcast, you can listen to it later as often as you would like.

For this podcast, we are looking for your help. Basically, we want your opinion on streaming. Do you think it’s ethical, a good strategy, completely ethical but a bad idea, or could you not care less? Whatever your opinion is, we want it.

If you are not familiar with the term, check this out for a brief synopsis.  Nash and myself have both written articles on the matter recently, so feel free to check those out.

Feel free to get us your opinion however you want. All of our email accounts and Twitter handles will be posted below, as well as our Facebook page. You can also respond to this article with your opinion. If you have an opinion on it, we want to know it.

We look forward to hearing from you and bringing you another edition of Crackerjack Chat!

Via email:
clave@fantasybaseballcrackerjacks.com
dixon@fantasybaseballcrackerjacks.com
nash@fantasybaseballcrackerjacks.com

Via Twiiter:
@FBCrackerjacks
@clavejones
@mdixon1985
@nash1025

Or on Facebook.

 

Ask Nash: Streaming

Nash —  April 20, 2012 — 15 Comments

How/When do you decide to pick up a free agent and dump a slumping player vs. letting the player ride out his slump?  Same question applies when you’re making daily roster adjustments swapping a bench guy for a guy you play daily.
Eric, from Puckett’s Pond

This is certainly a question I might answer differently depending on the situation, league, players involved, etc.  There is no exact science for knowing when to cut a guy loose or when to nab a hot player from the wire. However, there are some things I look at that help me decide and for this question I’ll answer by talking about streaming.

First, let’s define “streaming” as it is a term we in “the biz” refer to a lot.  Streaming refers to the practice of adding and dropping players often in order to maximize counting statistics. It is primarily used for pitchers to get the greatest possible number of starts.

HITTERS
I am never a fan of “streaming” hitters
, as it much more of a crap shoot unless you are able and willing to do a TON of research!  A smarter way to approach maximizing your hitting stats is to roster one or two bench hitters that play multiple positions so you can get them in your lineup when other guys are not playing.

Let’s use three examples. When dealing with slumping guys such as Kevin Youkilis, Gaby Sanchez or Alexei Ramirez it gets a little tempting when guys like Chase Headley, Adam Laroach, and Rafael Furcal who play their same positions, are hitting well, and are just sitting in free agency.

  • I am on the same page as Dixon when it comes to trusting more established guys to break out of a slump. A guy like Youkilis will average out at some point and if I am in a Roto style league I would be crazy to drop him before getting some of the good stats I can trust to be there by season’s end.
  • When a guy like Gaby Sanchez is slumping, has been moved from his more productive 4 or 5 spot in the lineup AND isn’t all that established as a surefire hitter, I wouldn’t feel the slightest bit hesitant for dropping him for Adam Laroach, who is a guy who rolls in bursts.
  • Then we have the Alexei Ramirez types, who when healthy and playing well is a streaky player, but when he is ailing and playing poorly he is a cancer to a lineup. I for one wouldn’t draft him to begin with, and certainly would be quick to trust a Furcal type player to have a little left in the tank for one more solid fantasy season!

PITCHERS
On to pitchers. Streaming pitchers has become a real hot topic in fantasy baseball it seems.  There are 3 factions forming, 1) the streamers 2) the anti-streamers and the 3) “what’s streaming?”ers.

I for one am all for streaming. It is a strategy that is not perfect and can be stopped or limited with simple innings or starts caps.  But if your league allows it a strategy that can cheaply maximize your roster. Sorry anti-streamers.

When it comes to streaming in pitchers it is as important to know when to drop a guy as it is to know when to pick a guy up.  All leagues that I have played in have a column showing ownership % of players.  This is a column that should help you to evaluate the value of guys at your disposal.  Right now people may still be adding and dropping Kyle Lohse at will, however he seems to be garnering more and more respect and his ownership is nearing 100%. Don’t be that guy that drops him now and loses him to someone willing to roster him for the long term.

When a guy reaches 100% ownership it is time to couple him with another guy, find a trade partner, and upgrade a position.  Especially if it is before June and the rookies haven’t come up yet, because they gee you whole new crop of arms to stream!

Fantasy baseball: What is streaming?

Michael Dixon —  April 19, 2012 — 3 Comments

So, since announcing that we were going to do a show about streaming and looking for opinions, we’ve had a few people ask just what exactly streaming is. Well, it’s a practice you’re probably used to dealing with, even if you’re not familiar with the term. So, here’s the synopsis.

Streaming is used a lot in head to head leagues, but also in roto leagues. It is also a practice often used in fantasy football, especially with defenses. Basically, what it means is that you often sign starting pitchers daily.  You can do it with other players, but pitching is where it’s nearly exclusively used, at least in baseball.

Basically, an owner signs a pitcher throwing one day, uses him, releases him, and signs another pitcher in his place. It can be a never-ending cycle, or it could be just used to pick up a win or some strikeouts in a weekly matchup. Actually, streaming is something that I have written an article about.

So, knowing that, if you have an opinion on the matter, we want to hear it, as it will be a part of our Podcast. You can reach us in several ways, all of which are included at this link.

If you have an opinion on the matter (even if you don’t really care if people do it), we want to know your opinion and why you feel that way.

Cracker Jack Chat: We want your opinions

Michael Dixon —  April 18, 2012 — 3 Comments

Readers. Next Tuesday we will be doing our second podcast and hope that everyone will tune in. A link will be provided in the coming days.

The topic that we’ll be discussing is streaming.

It’s been a sensitive issue for all of the Crackerjacks, and I am sure it is in leagues you’re all a part of, even in different sports. Some use it a lot, some never do, some split the difference.

Every one of you guys can help our show out by giving us your opinion on the matter. Is this a strategy you use? Do you think it’s chicken to use it, or even unethical? Could you honestly not care any less? Whatever your opinion is, we want it.

Just note that your view may be shared on the podcast.

As far as how to reach us, there are many ways. You may respond here with your opinion.

You can also reach us via email:
clave@fantasybaseballcrackerjacks.com
dixon@fantasybaseballcrackerjacks.com
nash@fantasybaseballcrackerjacks.com

Via Twiiter:
@FBCrackerjacks
@clavejones
@mdixon1985
@nash1025

Or on Facebook.

We want to know your opinion on the matter and would love to share that with our audience. Whatever way you feel comfortable reaching us is fine. Any time between between now and Tuesday, April 24 at 7 p.m. Eastern.

Whatever way is the most natural for you is fine for us.

RA Dickey

Folks, I have to admit to being a little confused about something, and I am really looking for your help. I guess the best way to get an answer is to just ask the question, so why is R.A. Dickey not on more fantasy rosters?

As of right now, he’s owned in less than 10 percent of ESPN leagues. This is puzzling, to say the least. I know that I have written that I like to stockpile depth in pitching, and also stream. While those strategies have worked for me, others do have different strategies, that’s fine.

With Dickey, we’re not just looking at a guy to stream in against a bad offense, or to add depth. This guy is good. Let’s take a look at Dickey’s overall production in his two years as a Met, and you can judge for yourself.

W K ERA WHIP
2010 11 104 2.84 1.19
2011 8 134 3.28 1.23

 

We can start with the negatives. The main one is that the Mets are likely going to be a distant fifth place in the National League East. All four of their rivals have been pegged as at least good threats to win the division, while the Mets are more in the “If everything breaks right, they could win about 80 games” range.

Expecting anything more than about 12 wins would be being optimistic, and I only give that number because he’s currently 2-0 in only two starts.

The strikeouts aren’t great, but I don’t see that as an overall negative. See, with very few exceptions, guys who strike out a lot of hitters also walk a lot of hitters. There are exceptions, but those are elite names, and I don’t think that writing about Roy Halladay is going to do anyone any good, it’s not like he’s available to you.

But Dickey hardly walks anyone, hence a low WHIP. While he will occasionally allow some hits, the ERA shows that those don’t tend to score. Citi Field is still a nice pitcher’s park, and he plays half of his games there.

While knuckleballs do get hit, it’s usually not very hard. You can dink and dunk your way to a few hits, but it’s extremely hard to turn those into serious run-scoring rallies without a shot to the gap, or at least a clean shot to the outfield. Dickey doesn’t allow many of those, so not many runs cross the plate.

I’ll tell you what else Dickey does, because the ERA and WHIP are so reliably low. With a guy like that, you can afford to bring in guys on teams like the Red Sox and Yankees. These pitchers will win a lot of games, but it’s doubtful that they will have a low ERA or WHIP. Look at the currently injured John Lackey’s 2011 season. His ERA and WHIP were abysmal, but still managed 12 wins.

You can mold Dickey along with one of those types into a pretty decent duo.

Now, if you’re in a league with me, you’re out of luck. If Dickey was available after the draft, I nabbed him. But if you’re in what appears to be many other leagues, there is a very reliable arm in many different formats waiting to be claimed. I wouldn’t waste much time doing so.

Chad Billingsley vs. Aramis Ramirez

Before I get into some advice, let me tell a quick story. It’s draft day in an auction league that Nash, Clave, and myself are all a part of. I am sitting in front of my computer, Slurpee in hand (I am so thankful that I have a 7-11 within two minutes of my house), and Matt Kemp’s name comes up.

Now, I had no plans on drafting Matt Kemp. Generally, I don’t lay a draft out as thoroughly as Nash does, but I do know the big names that I am targeting; Kemp was not on that list. But he seemed to be going for a little cheaper than I had anticipated, so I uttered a phrase which I will not repeat, bid on Kemp, and landed him.

In doing so, I basically passed on any real chance I had of getting a true ace, but I did not care. The reason is that I have no problem having a revolving door for a pitching staff.

No, I am not talking about streaming, more selective streaming.

That’s not a foolproof strategy but if done well, it will work out for you. Here are a few tips to look at.

1. Look for people against bad offenses
This is not all that unlike streaming defenses in fantasy football, which I also do. Basically, there are offenses to avoid, and offenses to attack. For example, in a few of my leagues, I brought in Chad Billingsley to start for me on Friday vs. the Padres.

In that start, he went 8 1/3 innings, allowed three hits, one walk, and struck out 11 men. Quite frankly, I know that the Padres have no offense. Billingsley isn’t good enough to activate in every one of his starts, but when he’s facing a bad offense in a pitcher’s park, he’s easily good enough to play.

Basically, ask yourself “What’s the worst that can happen?” I know that this strategy works a lot better in weekly head to head leagues, but idea still works. The Padres aren’t going to go out and rock anyone. If we’re talking about a team like the Reds or Diamondbacks, leave Billingsley on the pine. Teams like the Padres are safe bets. Stream pitchers facing them at will.

2. Bring in high strikeout guys
At the very least, you know that you’ll get something. Don’t bring these guys in during weekly play when you’re in a battle for WHIP (as they tend to walk a lot of hitters), but the rest of the categories are fine.

But if nothing else, the strikeouts will be there. Look at Tim Lincecum’s Opening Day start against the Diamondbacks. Arizona roughed him up a little bit, but he still had seven punch outs in less than six innings. That ratio will work very well for your squad. Look to guys like Jonathan Sanchez or Francisco Liriano if you’re trying to find players that could be available.

Even in bad outings, high strikeout guys fill that stat very well. That’s something to keep in mind.

3. Look at your league’s standings
Okay, this is a piece of advice I would give to anyone trying to figure any roster dilemma out, but it really applies here.

Let the season go a little bit. I am not suggesting that you draft no pitchers, just don’t waste money or early round picks on them.

If you are in a weekly league, you can look week to week to see what the critical categories will be. If it’s a roto league, give it a month or two to get a shape of where you stand in what categories.

If you’re in need of a strikeout guy but aren’t as concerned with walks (or WHIP), then you bring in a guy like that. Maybe you need a guy to solidify your WHIP (a guy like R.A. Dickey is a stud in that regard). If you don’t need the strikeouts, look for that guy.

Lastly, maybe you just need a high win guy, in which case pitchers on the Yankees or Red Sox become valuable.

The bottom line is that you need innings to have any chance in pitching categories. With innings, you will get more strikeouts and wins, as well as saves if you carry a few closers. But it also helps you minimize the damage done by a single runner (WHIP) or run (ERA).

If you stream properly, you can be sure that those innings are almost all effective ones. Going after guys in good situations that fill needs will go a long way in making your pitching staff one of the best in your league.

Best of all, it will also allow you to build a killer offense. Think about streaming pitchers in for the rest of the year. If you need any help, it’s a strategy I like to use a lot, and I can promise it will populate a lot of my posts.